Site Map Icon
RSS Feed icon
Upcoming Events
Memorial Day - Office Closed
May 28, 2018
Flag Day
Jun 14, 2018
Executive Board Meeting
Jun 15, 2018
DMAL Headquarters 15677 E. 17th Ave. Aurora, CO 80011
Father's Day
Jun 17, 2018
First Day of Summer
Jun 21, 2018
Maintenance Craft Information
Feb 06, 2018

Maintenance Announces New Webinar Training:

Challenging TL-5 Staffing with Newly Developed TL-5 Program!

On Feb. 27, Maintenance Division Director Steven Raymer, Assistant Director (A) Idowu Balogun and Assistant Director (B) Terry B. Martinez will be presenting a webinar training on Challenging TL-5 Staffing with Newly Developed TL-5 Program. The training will be from 1 p.m. - 3 p.m. EST. More details and registration can be found here. 

Feb 06, 2018

Arbitrator Goldberg Makes Ruling on MSC Staffing


02/02/2018 - On January 31, Arbitrator Stephen Goldberg issued his opinion in case Q10T-4Q-C 13332310.

AWARD: The Postal Service did not violate MMO-057-12 on the May 9, 2012 Settlement Agreement by failing to count maintenance supervisors within the number of positions supported for determining Maintenance Support Clerk staffing.

The APWU presented the issue as:

Does the Postal Service violate the May 9, 2012 settlement agreement and MMO 057-12 by failing to count maintenance supervisors within the “number of positions supported” for determining Maintenance Support Clerk (MSC) staffing?

The award stunned the Maintenance Division Officers as the Arbitrator used inconsistent language to justify his opinion. In an admitted attempt at being tactful, Maintenance Director Raymer stated the Maintenance Officers were “extremely disappointed.”

The union’s case included the fact that MSCs do support maintenance supervisors:

Mr. Raymer’s testimony was corroborated by three different Processing and Distribution Centers MSCs – Alzena Johnson (Lafayette, LA), Jennifer Johnson-Heiss (Madison, WI), and Jaime Kleeberger (St. Pail, MN) – each of whom testified to the extensive support MSCs provide to maintenance supervisors. See page 6 of the award for details.

Despite the excellent testimony of the actual MSCs, the Arbitrator ignored that this was a significant portion of the duty assignment and entitled to be credited in properly determining the workload.

In the award, the Arbitrator credits the USPS testimony that they intended to exclude maintenance supervisors from the determination of the number of employees supported.

The fact is that the Postal Service did not exclude the supervisors in the final document, and even initially informed the APWU in their Article 19 noticeto the APWU that a new staffing calculation had been developed to correctly align the current workload to the number of authorized positions. These details may be found on page 9 of the award. 

This puts the matter back to square one. If the Postal Service did or did not want something included it was incumbent on the Postal Service to raise the matter, otherwise the normal and usual methods of contract interpretation should apply.

The Arbitrator - on pages 11 & 12 of the award - noted that in Article 1.2 the parties do specifically make an exclusion of supervisors when using the term “employees.” From this it is obvious that without such exclusion, the term “employees” does indeed include supervisors!

Inexplicably, the Arbitrator said otherwise.

 PDF (344.63 KB)

Feb 06, 2018

Change is Continuous

(This article first appeared in the January-February 2018 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine)

By Maintenance Craft Directors 

On Oct. 17, we attended a national Tech & Mech joint committee meeting with the USPS. APWU Maintenance, Clerk and MVS Officers, as well as representatives from the Mail Handlers were present. The USPS attendees included program managers over many of the new or changed equipment systems and, of course, labor relations.

The majority of this Tech & Mech agenda was presented by Assistant Director Terry B. Martinez during his report to the Maintenance Division General Session at the recent All-Craft Conference in Las Vegas. The Postal Service gave us the current status of their initiatives:

  • Automated Parcel & Bundle Sorter Infeed (APBS) – This included both the semi-automatic singulator and development of pallet box alternatives.
  • Automated Delivery Unit Sorter (ADUS) – as the name implies, this is another attempt to put sortation equipment in stations. Testing has been in the FDR station since 2015 and management wants to try it in four different locations. Installation and training should have already occurred (absent any sliding in the deployment) at Chelsea, MA; Paschal, PA; JCTM in DC; and Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  • Advanced Letter Processing System (ALPS) – The Postal Service’s replacement for the Delivery Bar Code Sorter (DBCS). Testing is ongoing at Richmond, VA and Oklahoma City, OK.
  • Expanded Package Processing System (EPPS) – An update to Automated Package Processing System (APPS) being tested in Portland, OR. Local Maintenance is trained on this machine.
  • High Throughput Package Sorter (HTPS) – Testing in Denver, CO and Queens, NY. It is intended to leverage other parcel sorting designs and subsystems.
  • Automatic Guided Vehicles (AGV) – A self-driven powered industrial vehicle being tested at Penwood Place P&DC (Warrendale, PA) and Queens P&DC, NY. This concept can be an impact to both tuggers and pallet moving equipment.
  • Next Generation Delivery Vehicle (NGDV) – a new delivery vehicle.
  • High Density Staging System (HSFF) – This is an upgrade to the Flats Sequencing System (FSS) machines that replaces existing four feeders with two high speed feeders. Currently utilized at Dulles P&DC (installed 2013); Philadelphia P&DC (2014); and Royal Palm P&DC (2015). Maintenance personnel are trained on this modification.
  • SPSS Keying System (SPSS) – a keying station to be installed by Maintenance on console 1 at sites with a small package sorting system. It is intended to provide SPSS sites the ability to finalize No-Read mail at the SPSS.

If we are notified at the headquarters level of the Postal Service’s decision to contract this work out, we will challenge it and file a dispute.

As always, do not take as gospel any management assertion that there is a national contract between the USPS and a vendor to justify the contracting out of our work. Always proceed to file a local grievance with the facts for your specific circumstance. The Maintenance Division provides local officers and our National Business Agents with regular updates of subcontracting challenged under Article 32 at the headquarters level.

As always, please say “Hi” and “Happy New Year” to your friendly floor steward.

June 26, 2018 marks the official opening session for negotiations on our next Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA). Maintenance Division Officers are, once again, geared up for our struggle to improve the working lives of our membership. We are certainly up to whatever the Postal Service will throw at us.

As members of the APWU, your thoughts and input are always welcome. Please bear in mind that not every concern or idea ends up as an actual proposed change to the CBA. Sometimes, it is a matter of enforcing the existing language. In that regard, your input on what you believe we should strive to maintain is important.

Page Last Updated: Feb 06, 2018 (08:20:23)
Member Login


Not registered yet?
Click Here to sign-up

Forgot Your Login?
<< May 2018 >>
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Site Search
Site Map
RSS Feeds
Weather Report
Important Links
National APWU
Denver Metro Area Local APWU
Copyright © 2018, All Rights Reserved.
Powered By UnionActive™

319423 hits since Apr 07, 2008

Top of Page image